Original Article

Study of Human Factors in Rural Kitchen Design

Year: 2021 | Month: June | Volume 10 | Issue 2

References (15)

1.Charu, 2014. Developing ergonomically designed kitchen aid for reducing physiological stress of women working in standing type kitchen, Thesis Ph.d (Family Resource Management). College of Home Science Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana

View at Google Scholar

2.Haukka, E., Leino-Arjas, P., Vikari-Juntura, E., Takala, E.P., Malmivaara, A., Hopsu, L., Mutanen, P., Krtola, R, Virtanen, T, Pehkonen, M.I., Holtaru-Leino, M., Nykanen, J., Stenholm, S., Nykri, E. and Rihimaki, H. 2008. A randomized controlled trial on whether a participatory ergonomics intervention could prevent musculoskeletal disorders. Occup. Environ. Med., 65: 849-856.

View at Google Scholar

3.Johari, A. 2015. Will a government study confirm what we always knew: Indian women work more hours than men. Gender inequality. https://scroll.in/article/702430/will-a-governmentstudy- confirm-what-we-always-knew-indian-women-work-morehours- than-men. Last accessed on 16th December 2020.

View at Google Scholar

4.Khatoon, J., Verma, B. and Dayal, R. 2007. Grip assessment of rural women performing dishwashing activity in Deoria district (U.P.) 2: 125-131. In: Gite, L.P., Mehta, C.R., Kotwaliwale, N. and Majumdar, J. (ed) Developments in Agricultural and Industrial Ergonomics. Allied Publishers Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi.

View at Google Scholar

5.Kishtwaria, J., Mathur, P. and Rana, A. 2007. Ergonomic evaluation of kitchen work concerning space designing. J. Hum. Ecol., 21: 43-46.

View at Google Scholar

6.Kumari, P. and Dayal, R. 2009. Feeling of discomfort perceived by rural women while working in the existing kitchen arrangements. Asian. J. Home Sci., 3(2): 158-160.

View at Google Scholar

7.Laddha, S. and Shraddha, 2007. Impact of work practices on musculoskeletal problems of rural women. Proc Humanizing Work and Work Environment (HWWE). Pp 67. Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal, India.

View at Google Scholar

8.Sandhu, P., Malik, M. and Bakhshi, R. 2008. Recommendations for selected household workstations for Punjabi (Indian) women. Proc. 9th Southeast Asian Ergon. Conf. (SEAES). pp 60. Bangkok, Thailand.

View at Google Scholar

9.Sandhu, P., Malik, M. and Kaur, H. 2007. Analysis of gap between existing and formulated kitchen work counters in selected households of Ludhiana city. J. Dairying, Foods and Home Sci., 26(1): 42-47.

View at Google Scholar

10.Snedecor, George, W., Cochran, and William, G. 1989. Statistical Methods, Eighth Edition, Iowa State University Press.

View at Google Scholar

11.Sultana, S. and Prakash, C. 2013. Benefits of using ergonomic kitchen designs for today’s homemaker. Golden Research Thought, 3(6): 1-7.

View at Google Scholar

12.Tehrani, M.M. 2012. The Role of Technology in Providing the Efficiency of Kitchen Design. Master of Science in Architecture. Eastern Mediterranean University Gazima?usa, North Cyprus.

View at Google Scholar

13.Thakur, V. 2007. Modular smart kitchen workstation. Master of Design Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.

View at Google Scholar

14.Verghese, M.A., Chattarjee, L., Aterya, N. and Bhatnagar, A. 1989. Ergonomic Evaluation of Household Activities UGC Report. Dept of Family Resource Management, SNDT, Bombay, India.

View at Google Scholar

15.Young Jun Ko, H.R. 2007. Expanded Evaluation System for Design.

View at Google Scholar

@International Journal of Social Sciences(IJSS)| Published by AESSRA

5400161 - Visitors since February 20, 2019