Original Article
Assessment of Trend for Area, Production, Productivity and Post-harvest losses of Onion and Potato in Uttar Pradesh, India
Year: 2024 | Month: June | Volume 69 | Issue 2
1.Government of India. 2020. Third Advance Estimates of Production of Foodgrains for 2019-20, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India.
View at Google Scholar2.Government of India. 2023. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance-2022, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India.
View at Google Scholar3.Gathambiri, C.W., Owino, W.O., Imathiu, S. and Mbaka, J.N. 2021. Post-harvest losses of bulb onion (Allium capa L.) in selected sub-counties of Kenya. Af. J. of Agric. and Nutritional Dev., 21(2): 17529-17544.
View at Google Scholar4.Gulati, A., Terway, P. and Hussain, S. 2021. Performance of agriculture in Uttar Pradesh: Revitalizing Indian agriculture and boosting farmer incomes, India Studies in Business and Economics, pp. 175-210.
View at Google Scholar5.Jahan, S.E., Hassan, M.K., Roy, S., Ahmed, Q. M., Hasan, G.N., Muna, A.Y., Islam, M.M. 2020. Survey to collect information on pre- and post-harvest handling status and assess post-harvest losses of cucumber. Int. J. of Business Management and Soc. Res., 8(1): 443-458.
View at Google Scholar6.Jha, S.N., Vishwakarma, R.K., Ahmad, T., Rai, A. and Dixit, A.K. 2015. Report on assessment of quantitative harvest and post-harvest losses of major crops and commodities in India. ICAR-All India Coordinated Research Project on Post-Harvest Technology, ICAR-CIPHET: 1-173.
View at Google Scholar7.Kharrumnuid, P., Devarani, L. and Singh, R. 2023. Growth performance of potato in India vis-a vis North East India. Indian J. of Ext. Edu., 59(1): 37-41.
View at Google Scholar8.Krishna, M.B., Abhina, D., Kumara C., Suhasini, K. and Shrinivasa C. 2022. Assessment of post-harvest losses of major vegetables in Rangareddy district of Telangana, Int. J. of Environ. and Clim. Change, 12(11): 1610-1619.
View at Google Scholar9.Kundu, P. and Tapan, M. 2020. A survey on vegetables production and productivity on some selected vegetable growing belts of South Paragnas, District of West Bengal, Int. J. of Recent Scientific Res., 11(10): 39760-39773.
View at Google Scholar10.Kumar, S., Joshi, D. and Upadhyay, S. 2019. Horticulture sector in Uttar Pradesh (India): Regional trends and its determinants. J. of Appl. Horti., 21(3): 237-243.
View at Google Scholar11.Mittal, S. 2007. Can horticulture be a success story for India? Working Paper No. 197, New Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER).
View at Google Scholar12.Nalegaonkar, A.R., More, S.S., Shelke, R.S. and Gade, P.A. 2020. Growth and instability in area, production and yield of onion in India. Int. J. of Curr. Microb. and Appl. Sci., 9(11): 2761-2767,
View at Google Scholar13.Pandey, E., Rai, V. N., Singh, N. and Singh, P.K. 2018. Growth in potato production: A zone wise analysis in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Int. J. of Curr. Microb. and Appl. Sci., 7(5): 2429-2434.
View at Google Scholar14.Patrey, S. and Deshmukh, M.K. 2022. An economic analysis of post-harvest losses of major oilseeds in Mungeli district of Chhattisgarh state. Int. J. of Curr. Microb. and Appl. Sci., 11(08): 17-22.
View at Google Scholar15.Priyadarshini, M., Kundu, K.K. and Kumar, P. 2020. Impact of mission for integrated development of horticulture (MIDH) in Haryana. J. of Agric. and Ecol., 9: 83-91.
View at Google Scholar16.Rao, K.S. 2019. Vegetable cultivation in central zone of UP: Trends and variations, Shodh Darpan, 10(1): 39-47.
View at Google Scholar17.Ramaiah V.C. 2022. Production and productivity of horticultural crops in India and Andhra Pradesh. Int. J. of Multidisci. Educational Res., 6(3): 13-18.
View at Google Scholar18.Sahu, S., Sharma, J.P., Burman, R.R.,Gills, R., Kumar, P. and Sharma, R.R. 2021. Determinants of post-harvest losses in onion in Pune and Nashik districts of Maharashtra. J. of Community Mobilization and Sustain. Dev., 16(1): 296-300.
View at Google Scholar19.Singh, D.K , Pynbianglang, K. and Pandey, N.K. 2017.Market and price behaviour of potato in Agra district of Uttar Pradesh, Econ. Affa., 62(2): 341-345.
View at Google Scholar20.Singh, A., Vaidya, G., Jagota, V., Darko, D.A., Agarwal, R.K., Debnath, S. and Potrich, E. 2022. Recent advancement in post-harvest loss mitigation and quality management of fruits and vegetables using machine learning frameworks, J. of Food Quality, pp. 1-9:
View at Google Scholar21.Singh, O.P., Singh, P.K. and Bishi, G. 2020. Economic analysis of production and marketing of onion in Deogarh district of Odisha, India. p. 105-112. In Rao, Ratnesh Kumar (eds.), Agricultural Development and Economic Transformation in Global Scenario, Part-II. Published by Mahima Research Foundation and Social welfare, 194, Karaundi, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi.
View at Google Scholar22.Singh, V.P. and Singh, O.P. 1997. Spacio-temporal variation in production of groundnut, rapeseed-Mustard, sesamum and linseed crops: A decomposition approach, Agril. Situation in India, 54(5): 241-246.
View at Google Scholar23.Tadesse, B., Bakala, F. and Mariam, L.W. 2018. Assessment of post-harvest loss along potato value chain: the case of Sheka Zone, southwest Ethiopia. Agric. & Food Security, 7(1): 1-14.
View at Google Scholar24.Tiwari A., Afroz, S.B. and Kumar, V. 2021. Market vulnerabilities and potential of horticulture crops in India: With special reference to TOP crops. Indian J. of Agril. Market., 35(3): 1-20.
View at Google Scholar25.World Bank. 2020. The global economy, Business and economic data for two hundred country based on World Bank estimation. https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/ India/
View at Google Scholar26.Zenbaba, O.S. 2021. Empirical review on determinants of potato and onion production technology packages adoption in Ethiopia. Int. J. of Agric. Sci. and Technol., 7(3): 285-291.
View at Google Scholar



